Updated on November 9, 2023

·

Created on August 27, 2015

DFA Paper-based liver function test (AIDS, TB)

Upcoming Update

Diagnostics for All (DFA) Paper-Based Liver Test is a prototype low-cost, paper-based diagnostic testing for liver enzymes.

Developed By Unknown
Content Partners
Unknown

Author

Product Description

Diagnostics for All (DFA) Paper-Based Liver Test is a prototype low-cost, paper-based diagnostic testing for liver enzymes. A fingerprick of blood and 15 minutes will give healthcare providers an assessment of the patient’s liver health.

Target Users (Target Impact Group)

Distributors / Implementing Organizations

Distributed by manufacturer

Intellectural Property Type

Patent Protected

Design Specifications

Chemically versatile : Patterned paper technology can be applied to generate immunoassay, electrochemical analysis, clinical chemistry analysis and molecular diagnosis. Easy-to-use and easy-to-read : Finger prick samples are sufficient to produce results that do not require a syringe, clean water, or sample preparation. Results are quickly displayed for immediate clinical decision making. Disposable : DFA's pattern-based paper-based devices are disposable, and can be easily and safely disposed of through incineration, ensuring that medical waste issues around the world do not grow.

Technical Support

Provided by the manufacturer

Replacement Components

N/A

Lifecycle

Single-use product

Manufacturer Specified Performance Parameters

Designer specified performance targets include: portable, and low-cost.

Vetted Performance Status

Waiting for response from manufacturer

Safety

No known safety hazards are related to this product.

Complementary Technical Systems

None

Academic Research and References

Andres, W., Scott, T., et al., 2010, Programmable diagnostic devices made from paper and tape. Royal Society of Chemistry, 10,  pp. 2499 – 2504.

Mohidus, K., George, T., et al., 2010, Paper Diagnostic for Instantaneous Blood Typing. Analytical Chemistry, 82 (10),pp. 4158-4164.

Compliance with regulations

DFA has an exclusive worldwide license from Harvard for medical and other technical applications.

Other Information

None

Comments from the Community

5 Comments

  1. Michael Moscherosch says:

    Buy-one-give-one is charity based and not a sustainable or scalable business model.

  2. Michael Moscherosch says:

    Similar to BeGirl Flexi Pads, using a reusable “sleeve” with disposable absorbent material is an interesting approach. If used properly, this could reduce the risk of infection from contaminated absorbent material. But herein also lays a risk: Not only might it be difficult for women find suited “clean” absorbent materials, sanitizing the panties properly between uses could also pose a challenge (e.g. lack of clean water, disinfectant soap etc.). User compliance to cleaning instructions could also be an issue. Improper cleaning of the panties between uses or the use of unsuited absorbents could result in the pads carrying pathogens which could have detrimental health effects, effectively posing a similar risk as traditional reusable cloth napkins made from old saris etc. I’d be reluctant to trade off health benefits in menstrual health management.

  3. Matt Sisul says:

    Again, make sure the links target a new window or tab.

  4. Robert Hauck says:

    Both coverage to obtain orders and logistics to ensure delivery must be designed to function effectively in the specified environment. The stated distribution of “Africa” and “India” is unclear as to whether these products will be used in capital cities or more broadly in regional centers or even up country clinics. The product information simply says that distribution will be made through “Direct Sales” implies that MSF will be staffing a sales team. It is unclear if such a strategy is practical. Given the size and weight of this type of product and the utility connections to water supplies etc. trained installation specialists and technicians are required to ensure proper installation. More detail is required to define and effective strategy and ability to scale.

  5. Noel Wilson says:

    Stating following a design toolkit shouldn’t be in ‘Compliance with regulations’. Consider removing ?

Leave a Reply

Explore similar solutions

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

Zika paper-based rapid diagnostic test

Read Solution

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

Sanivation Container-Based Sanitation (CBS) Waste Collection Service

Read Solution

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

Towards Safer School Construction: A Community-Based Approach

Read Solution

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

Jute Cellulose-based PPE

Read Solution

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

Compartment Bag Test (CBT) Kit

Read Solution

Implemented by

Aquagenx

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

mWater Field Test Kit

Read Solution

Implemented by

mWater

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

Fyodor Urine Malaria Test (UMT)

Read Solution

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

NTU Singapore Water Test

Read Solution

Implemented by

Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

Hach Drinking Water Test Kit

Read Solution

Implemented by

HACH

Agriculture

November 9, 2023

LAMP on Disc COVID-19 Test

Read Solution
All Solutions

Get more information about Solutions Library and its features.

Learn More

Have thoughts on how we can improve?

Give Us Feedback